Article Review Process

STEPS

1. The Editorial Board examines the compliance with the instructions for authors. Articles that do not comply with all the requirements are returned to the authors for remediation.
2. The articles are submitted to peer review to the members of the Advisory Board.
3. After the reviewing process, every participant receives an answer, from the Editorial Board, regarding the publication of the scientific paper, as follows:
   • publish, a good paper;
   • publish after minor revision and improvements;
   • can be published only if major revisions and improvements are made;
   • reject, poor paper.
4. Articles that have received favourable review from the Advisory Board will be published. For the articles which do not meet the scientific requirements suggestions are sent to authors in order to be corrected. If improvements are made, the articles are reintroduced in the evaluation process described above.

• originality, relevance and usefulness of research;
• structure (title, abstract, key words, JEL classification, introduction, methodology and results, conclusions, references);
• style, spelling and punctuation;
• application of references;
• emphasis on results, interpretations and conclusions (creativity level).